Comments for Motivic stuff

Comment on Postdoc opportunities by Van123

Van123 — Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:02:45 +0000

Thank you very much for this list. It helped me increase my knowledge and increase the number of places I am planning to apply to!

Comment on Postdoc opportunities by Mathematical Jobs « Bourbaki et Sophie

Mathematical Jobs « Bourbaki et Sophie — Sun, 08 Jul 2012 02:11:15 +0000

[...] positions at the moment, this list also contains a lot of information on other kind of math jobs : Postdoc opportunities on homotopical.wordpress.com . Share this:FacebookDiggRedditEmailTwitterStumbleUponPrint [...]

Comment on Postdoc opportunities by A long list of postdoc opportunities « Motivic stuff

A long list of postdoc opportunities « Motivic stuff — Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:10:04 +0000

[...] finding and applying for postdoc positions in Europe over the last couple of years, here is now the big list that I wished someone had given me a few years ago. Like this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]

Comment on PhD position in motivic homotopy theory by Alexander Cruz

Alexander Cruz — Wed, 30 May 2012 04:40:20 +0000

Dr. Vladimir Guletskii.

My name is Alexander Cruz Cigarroa and live in Mexico, I am a graduate student at UNAM under the tutelage of Dr. Francisco Marmolejo Rivas, who also did my undergraduate thesis. I am interested in algebraic geometry, category theory and motives. Dr. Marmolejo sent me an e-mail to study motivic homotopy theory motivic zeta functions, and I keep investigating furthermore on the subject, as the notes of John Baez and liked it much. I wonder what are the requirements that I must submit to apply for the scholarship, because i dont have a very high level of english, or if I can apply in the future in order to meanwhile study English.

Thanks you for your attention.
Regards

Comment on Events by Konrad Voelkel's Blog – Mathemagically » Mathematics Resources «

Sat, 05 May 2012 06:06:52 +0000

[...] Andreas Holmstrom's list of lists [...]

Comment on PhD position in motivic homotopy theory by Vladimir Guletskii

Vladimir Guletskii — Mon, 09 Jan 2012 12:47:07 +0000

The application deadline for this vacancy has now been changed. The very latest date for starting the grant is 31st May 2012. As an exception, it is also possible to start it by the middle of summer 2012, asking for an extension later.

Overseas students are welcome but only the home fees will be covered by EPSRC.

Initial applications (detailed CV and Personal Statement on research) can be emailed to

vladimir.guletskii@liverpool.ac.uk

Comment on Paris events: Wall-crossing, model theory, multiple zeta values, and more by Kea

Kea — Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:37:11 +0000

Wow, that sounds like heaven! Oh no, wait a minute, that’s right. I don’t exist.

Comment on Motives conference in Mainz, July 4-8 by Paul

Paul — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:50:33 +0000

Well you can probably skip my 2nd question, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LSKD_PfJyc .

Comment on Motives conference in Mainz, July 4-8 by Paul

Paul — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:47:08 +0000

While I am optimistic:

I think Patrick Brosnan, Gregory Pearlstein, Morihiko Saito,… are working on the Hodge conjecture studying normal functions, do you know what the status of this is? Is it still very promising?

And what about Connes-Consani’s work on zeta-functions of F_1-schemes? Are they advancing well?

Comment on Conference on Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture by Paul

Paul — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 00:37:51 +0000

This is a little mysterious. Is the conjecture about to be proved? Would you be so kind as to share rumors or ideas you have on the topic?

I have a question. I think I understand the Tate conjecture (mostly) implies the Deligne-Beilinson conjecture, which I think generalize the BSD conjecture. Then: how much harder are the Tate conjectures thought to be than the BSD?

I think the Tate conjectures imply the Hodge conjecture too via some ideas of Deligne so I guess they are much harder than BSD.

Also what happened to Harada’s attempt at proving the standard conjectures? I have seen the paper was retracted. And why does the Tate conjecture (or the standard conjectures) for 1-motives imply it (resp. them) for all motives? That is, how does it imply that “the category of motives over finite fields is generated by abelian varieties”, as you quoted in this post: http://homotopical.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/update-on-haradas-proof/ ?

Well, don’t worry about ignoring my lazy questions, and thanks for all your work on this blog -and changing the “open link in new window” thing .